Nothing but the truth

نویسنده

  • Paige Brown
چکیده

Everything gives you cancer, at least if you believe what you read in the news or see on TV. Fortunately, every thing also cures cancer, from red wine to silver nanoparticles. Of course the truth lies somewhere in between, and scientists might point out that these claims are at worst dangerous sensationalism and at best misjudged journalism. These kinds of media story, which inflate the risks and benefits of research, have led to a mistrust of the press among some scientists. But are journalists solely at fault when science reporting goes wrong, as many scientists believe [1]? New research suggests it is time to lay to rest the myth that the press alone is to blame. The truth is far more nuanced and science reporting can go wrong at many stages, from the researchers to the press officers to the diverse producers of news. Many science communication researchers suggest that science in the media is not as distorted as scientists believe, although they do admit that science reporting tends to under-represent risks and over-emphasize benefits [2]. “I think there is a lot less of this [misreported science] than some scientists presume. I actually think that there is a bit of laziness in the narrative around science and the media,” said Fiona Fox, Director of the UK Science Media Centre (London, UK), an independent press office that serves as a liaison between scientists and journalists. “My bottom line is that, certainly in the UK, a vast majority of journalists report science accurately in a measured way, and it’s certainly not a terrible story. Having said that, lots of things do go wrong for a number of reasons.” Fox said that the centre sees everything from fantastic press releases to those that completely misrepresent and sensationalize scientific findings. They have applauded news stories that beautifully reported the caveats and limitations of a particular scientific study, but they

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Statistical Zero-knowledge Arguments: Theory and Practice

During a statistical zero-knowledge argument, the arguer convinces the verifier on the truth of an assertment, without revealing next to nothing—but the truth of the assertment—even to an omnipotent verifier. The crucial part here is “next to nothing”: compared to perfect zero-knowledge arguments where absolutely nothing (but the truth of the assertment) can be revealed, statistical zero-knowle...

متن کامل

مسکن مِلکی و دائمی یا مسکن موقّت و استیجاری در شهرهای دانش‌مدار

On one side, “the divine wisdom and knowledge-centric character of the celestial human soul and human self, and the never-satisfying natural urge of humans for truth-finding and scholarly dynamism” is an obvious truth, and prideful, to all thinkers. This truth bears nothing but “a kind of dynamic, scholarly life”, a type of lifestyle that can be achieved only in a dynami...

متن کامل

بنیانگذار وحدت وجود، حلاج یا ابن عربی؟

The unity of existence is one of the most important and complex mystical subjects on which many scholars, especially after Ibn ‘Arabi have always pondered. At a lower level, the Unity of Witness, -Wahdat-i Shohūd-, a spiritual station in which mystic under the spell of Divine love and rapture see nothing save God was presented, which can be identified with the Station of Combination- Maqām-i Ja...

متن کامل

A Gentzen Calculus for Nothing but the Truth

In their paper Nothing but the Truth Andreas Pietz and Umberto Rivieccio present Exactly True Logic (ETL), an interesting variation upon the four-valued logic for first-degree entailment FDE that was given by Belnap and Dunn in the 1970s. Pietz & Rivieccio provide this logic with a Hilbert-style axiomatisation and write that finding a nice sequent calculus for the logic will presumably not be e...

متن کامل

On telling dying patients the truth.

a busy outpatient clinic (he gives a horrifying example ofincompetent truth telling); it is an honesty which the patient has sought in the course of psychotherapeutically orientated discussion; it is an honesty which includes continuing support; and it is an honesty which, believes Dr Goldie, reduces unnecessary suffering and helps patients to survive it when it is inevitable. Such views, from ...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2013